Google: the sending of redirection URLs for indexing doesn’t make sense

Google's John Mueller lately defined that submitting a URL for indexing, when redirecting to a different URL, is mindless.

This subject has been coated within the newest #AskGoogleWebmasters video during which Mueller solutions a query about client-side JavaScript redirects.

Right here is the query that has been submitted:

"Can Google evergreen Chromium detect client-side JavaScript redirects?" I’m unable to ship a GSC indexing request to pages whose client-side JS redirection is directed to a subscription web page. "

In response, Mueller first defined what it means to have a Googlebot evergreen. This can be a pretty latest change on which you’ll be able to study extra right here.

Mueller responded to the redirect query by saying that Googlebot adopted client-side redirects in the identical method as server-side redirects.

Though Googlebot can monitor client-side JS redirects, it doesn’t make sense to submit a redirect URL for indexing.

That's proper, whether or not it's shopper aspect, server aspect, JS or HTML.

A redirect sends a sign to Googlebot indicating that the positioning proprietor would like that one other URL be listed.

So with that mentioned, it makes extra sense to submit the URL that ought to to be listed as an alternative.

Another choice is to ensure that Google is ready to uncover the popular URL. If it's linked to the web site, Googlebot will detect it throughout its regular scanning course of.

Mueller provides that utilizing a sitemap file can assist Google detect URLs quicker.

To listen to Mueller's full reply, see #AskGoogleWebmasters video beneath: